10 must-have features of enterprise low-code software
Vendors now slap "low-code" on almost anything, which makes comparing tools nearly impossible. These are the ten less-obvious features that separate an enterprise-class platform from a basic one, and the questions to ask before you buy.
Ten features that separate enterprise from basic
Introduction
When the term "low-code" first appeared, it did something useful: It separated enterprise-class development tools from basic ones. That distinction has since been lost.
Before the term existed, every web application development tool got lumped into one big pot. Some were built for enterprise development. Others were very basic developer tools. But they all sat in the same "web application development tools" (or RAD tools) category, so how could you find the right one when they were all so different? "Low-code" solved that problem. At least, that's how it started.
Now we're dealing with the same problem again. Software vendors have jumped on board and slapped the label on almost anything remotely related to low-code. The result is confusion. Look across the low-code options available today and you'll find wildly different features, which makes comparing them like comparing apples and oranges. We're back to where we started.
So how do you separate the basic tools from the enterprise-class ones? This paper answers that. We're skipping the obvious features, like enterprise-grade security, a point-and-click interface, and responsive design, which should be standard in any low-code tool. Instead, these are ten less-obvious features that any enterprise low-code platform should include, and the questions to ask a vendor about each.
Reusability
Enterprise low-code takes a building-block approach: Build a function once, reuse it everywhere.
Business applications used to be monolithic. Every application had all of its functions built in, which made them unwieldy and hard to maintain. Modern coding standards call for reusability instead: Reusable code blocks and web services you can call from many applications. It's a more logical approach, and it delivers more maintainable applications.
Enterprise low-code platforms should take that same building-block approach. They let you reuse functions and applications, or parts of applications, inside other applications. You create the basic building blocks, then combine them however you need. That brings three advantages:
- Maintenance: Rather than modifying every application, you modify a single block, and the change reflects across every application that uses it.
- Speed: Development gets faster over time. The more reusable blocks you build, the less you build from scratch.
- Power: Because you can combine blocks in different ways, there's effectively no limit to what you can assemble.
Hybrid options for developers and end users
You shouldn't have to buy two separate tools, one for developers and one for business users.
What's the difference between low-code and no-code? Low-code tools are generally aimed at developers. They help developers ship web applications quickly, but they still involve some coding in a typical build. No-code tools are aimed at citizen developers. They require no coding and are simple enough for business users, but they usually create more basic applications.
Do you really want to buy two separate development tools, one for each group? Probably not. Look for a low-code tool that takes a hybrid approach, usable by both developers and end users. There are two common ways this is done:
- Two build processes: One interface for developers, offering more options but requiring a more technical skillset, and a separate drag-and-drop interface for end users that requires no coding.
- A single, step-by-step build process: One wizard-like build that needs no coding, but lets you inject or edit code when you want to. No coding is required, but the option is always there.
Either way, the point is the same: An enterprise low-code tool should offer no-code capabilities too. Developers deliver faster, end users build their own apps, and it all runs on a single platform.
Citizen-developer controls
If end users can build apps, the platform needs granular permission controls to match.
Take the last point one step further. If you're letting end users create applications, or if the generated applications are used across many types of employees, the tool needs granular permission controls. Do you want users to have full access to every capability? Should everyone see the same data? Probably not. An enterprise-class low-code platform should let you manage permissions on several levels:
- Application level: Control application access per user or per user role, typically through a role-based menu that shows different options to different users.
- Row level: Critical for B2B, BI, and reporting apps. Row-level (or multi-tenant) permissions control data access within a single application, so multiple users share one app but each sees only the data they're authorized to.
- User privileges: Personalize features and security to individual users or roles, controlling an application's look and feel, showing or hiding options, and limiting capabilities.
- Developer permissions: Control what data and features individual developers can reach inside the development environment itself.
The most important features of low-code are for it to be easy-to-learn and easy-to-use, and that it should provide guardrails for citizen developers, so code is not implemented that goes against policy, security or compliance regulations.
Gaurav Dhillon, CEO of SnapLogicWorkflow automation
Inefficient, disconnected processes are one of the biggest sources of wasted time in a workday.
Why do so many businesses struggle here? Usually because their applications and processes weren't built for a digital era. The applications don't integrate with each other, and they don't use data changes to trigger the next step, so employees fill the gaps manually.
That's why automation is a critical part of a modern low-code tool. It should pass data between other applications and services, and trigger workflows when data is added or changed. Most importantly, it should include a workflow automation designer: A drag-and-drop way for users to automate business processes and set triggers that fire on data changes. Those triggers can start anything from an email notification to an API call.
BI, reporting, and dashboards
Most low-code tools connect to BI software. Few actually build the analytics themselves.
In our experience, most low-code tools don't offer business intelligence capabilities. They provide ways to connect to your BI software but don't offer analytics as a built-in feature. A low-code platform that also delivers BI, reporting, and dashboards has a real advantage, and here's why.
Standalone BI software generally provides read-only data access. It displays data but can't write back to the database. Low-code tools typically do the opposite: They create applications that read and write to the database, but usually don't offer analytics. Some low-code platforms deliver both. They read and write to the database and create reports, BI apps, and dashboards.
Why does that matter so much? Data writeback adds another level to your analytics. Rather than just displaying data, your BI apps and reports can take action, like sending alerts, performing actions based on data, and triggering workflows. That gives you proactive analytics that act on data changes automatically.
Customization
The idea that low-code can't be customized is a myth, but it's not true of every tool.
Customization, or a supposed lack of it, is a common concern with low-code. Many people wrongly assume you can't customize the generated applications, and customization is often listed as a drawback. That idea is a myth. It comes from assuming low-code platforms are the same as the 4GL and RAD tools of the past. Those older tools were limited; most enterprise-class low-code platforms today are not.
That said, tools do vary, and some are more limited than others. To make sure you choose one that doesn't box you in, ask the vendor questions like:
- How do you customize the generated applications? Is there a graphical editor? Can you modify the HTML and CSS if needed?
- Do you allow white-labeling, so the output matches your company's look and feel?
- Can we add custom business logic when we build? Is there a way to add external code, or create rules so applications fit our processes?
- Can you create and modify application templates, so you can change the look and feel of every generated application without editing each one by hand?
I believe that software is truly low-code when it allows for a reasonable level of customization. Many drag-and-drop programs don't allow you to personalize many basic functionalities. That makes their low-code feature become a teaser to lock customers in with their technology.
Rebeca Sena, Marketing Consultant at GetSpace.digitalStandard languages
A proprietary scripting language quietly undoes most of the reason you bought low-code.
The business case for low-code usually comes down to time and money: Deliver applications in less time, with fewer resources, and less coding knowledge. Those benefits only hold if the platform has a low learning curve and doesn't force a proprietary language on you. Some tools still require you to learn their own unique language. Avoid those.
Before you buy, ask: What skills are needed to use the platform? How long will it take to get up and running? What technical knowledge will our developers, or citizen developers, need? Those questions matter when you calculate the real ROI of the software. A platform built on standard languages means the skills your team builds transfer to other tools and roles, instead of being locked to one vendor.
Open architecture
The most important feature is one you can't see: What happens when the tool can't do everything you need.
Architecture is invisible to users, but its impact is enormous. It shapes portability, security, and flexibility, and it plays the biggest role in a low-code tool's integration and extendability. Because no tool does everything, the real question is how easily you can extend it. That comes down to two things: How easily it integrates with your existing systems, and how easily it integrates with third-party services.
Before you license any low-code platform, understand its integration capabilities. Does it support RESTful web services? Is it built on open technologies? What kind of code does it generate? Those questions save you from integration headaches down the road.
The most essential feature that a good low-code development tool should have is extendability. For developers, the most important thing is transparency and extensibility at all levels, with open model specifications. You must be able to easily enter the code level in order to create additional extensions for the platform.
Daniel Velez Vasquez, CEO at Home SecurityPlatform control
Before you commit, know exactly how hard it would be to leave.
Platform flexibility may not be a "feature" in the usual sense, but it's critically important. What happens if you decide to move away from the software later? How much vendor lock-in will you be dealing with? Look at the platform from three angles:
- Who controls the data? Is it stored in-house or on the vendor's servers? If it's on their servers, make sure there's a simple way to export and download it. Too many companies try to switch platforms only to find they don't even own their own data.
- Does the platform create standalone applications, or do they need an active subscription to run? You want applications that run independently of the development tool, so they keep working if you move away from it.
- How easily can you switch platforms? What happens if you decide to move your applications from the cloud to in-house, or the reverse? It may not be a concern now, but that flexibility can matter a great deal later.
Standardized processes
With multiple developers, a standard build process is what keeps your applications maintainable.
One often-overlooked advantage of low-code: Many tools standardize the development process. Why does that matter? With multiple developers on staff, you'll always get some variance in the code. Each developer has different habits and styles, and some follow strict standards while others don't. Left alone, that means different applications get built to different standards.
Anyone who has had to pick through another developer's code knows the value here. When everyone uses the same build process, a developer can jump into someone else's application and pick up where they left off. The level of standardization varies by tool, so understand how the build process works and how easily developers can document their changes.
Proper documentation about the no-code/low-code creations and automations you've made is as important as engineers who document their code. If I get hit by a bus, who on my team is going to have to come and untangle all my crazy stuff I've created?
Rory O'Brien, Head of Solutions at TonkeanSummary
The term "low-code development" was coined back in 2014. Since then we've seen an explosion of tools, with hundreds of options on the market today.
The problem: They're all different. Low-code is a vague term, and that vagueness is the whole problem. The software sold under it is all over the map, which leaves buyers wading through a jumbled mess of options that are genuinely hard to compare.
These ten features are the ones that don't always show up on a spec sheet, but play an outsized role in whether you succeed with a low-code tool: Reusability, hybrid developer and end-user options, citizen-developer controls, workflow automation, built-in BI, real customization, standard languages, open architecture, platform control, and standardized processes. Use them as your checklist, and the enterprise-class tools separate from the basic ones quickly.
White paper updated July 2026
See how m-Power measures up
Set up a demo and we'll walk through these features on m-Power, built over your own data, so you can judge it against the checklist yourself.